IOTA, known for its innovative approach to distributed ledger technology (DLT), has taken another big step forward with its IOTA 2.0 consensus mechanism. This evolutionary consensus model builds upon the foundation of the Nakamoto Consensus, popularized by Bitcoin, to tackle the challenges of a dynamic, interconnected ledger known as the Tangle.
This article explores how IOTA adapts Nakamoto’s principles to create a more adaptable and robust consensus model, all while ensuring the security and stability of its network.
Adapting the Nakamoto Consensus
In the world of blockchain technology, the Nakamoto Consensus has long been the gold standard for achieving consensus among nodes. According to the IOTA Foundation’s recent blog post, it relies on the idea that the longest or heaviest chain of blocks is the valid one. However, IOTA takes a step further by introducing the concept of a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG), where blocks are not merely linked sequentially, but rather form a dynamic web of interconnected blocks.
The IOTA Tangle, the underlying data structure, presents a unique challenge as network disruptions and malicious actors can lead to different nodes having distinct views of the ledger. IOTA 2.0 adapts Nakamoto’s concept by introducing the idea of the heaviest subDAG within the Tangle, thus creating a more adaptable consensus model.

Voting on the Tangle
In IOTA 2.0, each node actively participates in the consensus process. When a new block is created, it is attached to existing blocks, effectively encoding the node’s opinion about the validity of blocks and transactions within the Tangle. These votes are cast within validation blocks, issued by a selected validator committee chosen through a staking mechanism.

The weight of each vote in a validation block is determined by the validator’s significance within the committee, thus ensuring the security of the network. By summing the weight of blocks that validate a specific block or transaction, an “Approval Weight” is calculated, influencing the inclusion of consensus flags.

The Ledger DAG and Conflict Resolution
IOTA 2.0 utilizes a transaction model based on Unspent Transaction Outputs (UTXOs) for the processing and registration of transactions. This model offers several advantages, such as the ability to trace the history of funds through block associations. These associations contribute to the creation of the Ledger DAG, which represents all ledger changes made by blocks.
Furthermore, the UTXO system simplifies conflict resolution. Conflicts arise when different transactions consume the same UTXO, and the UTXO protocol effectively prevents complex double-spend scenarios, ensuring network integrity.
Tip Selection Algorithm
One of the key challenges is how nodes construct the Tangle and determine which conflicting transactions should be added to the ledger. Each block represents the issuer’s opinion and propagates through the Tangle’s past. However, it’s unfeasible for nodes to reference every eligible block.
IOTA addresses this challenge through the Tip Selection Algorithm (TSA), which randomly selects a limited number of references to ensure a diverse Tangle structure. This randomness helps avoid predetermined patterns in reference selection and supports efficient opinion propagation.
Consensus Flags and Slot Commitment Chains
IOTA 2.0 uses consensus flags and slot commitment chains to achieve agreement on block and transaction status. These consensus flags, such as “Acceptance” and “Confirmation,” represent varying levels of confidence in a block’s validity and its inclusion in the Tangle. Slot commitments play a crucial role in enabling nodes to compare their views of what is valid and confirmed.
The division of supermajority into “online” and “total” supermajorities ensures the continuous operation of the Tangle. Online supermajority provides preliminary consensus and commitments, while total supermajority acts as a more robust safeguard for the network.
Chain Switching Rule
When faced with network disruptions and the potential forking of slot commitment chains, IOTA 2.0 employs a Chain Switching Rule, similar to the Nakamoto Consensus. Nodes track and update their own slot commitment chains, giving preference to the latest finalized and heaviest chain.

Final Thoughts
In summary, IOTA’s Nakamoto Consensus for the Tangle represents a significant evolution in distributed ledger technology. By adapting Nakamoto’s principles to the unique challenges posed by the Tangle, IOTA has created a more adaptable, secure, and efficient consensus model that ensures the stability of its network.